justice lawyers
FREE case evaluation:
email us or call
1-800-513-1609
   
drug recall news
Nursing home abuse news
stock fraud news
Leukemia health news

Leukemia
One in 79 men and women in America will be diagnosed with leukemia during his or her lifetime, according to a National Cancer Institute SEER report. Though the survival rate for patients undergoing leukemia treatments has increased, leukemia continues to kill over 20,000 Americans each year. Learn more about leukemia and new treatments by clicking here.
Studies continue to show that alternative medicine can help recovery time and mental wellbeing of leukemia patients. To learn the differences between alternative and Western approaches to leukemia treatments or to find tips for seeking out an alternative healer, read our recent newsletter on Alternative Medicine & Leukemia Treatment.

Bad Blood Caused by Industry Abuses
Benzene as a known cause of leukemia had documented since 1948 when the American Petroleum Institute officially reported a link between this solvent used in many of its industries and cases of leukemia in its workers. Their findings concluded that there is no safe level of benzene exposure. Benzene for over a decade has carries the EPA’s “known carcinogen” designation. Yet, despite these facts, industries from tire manufacturers to microprocessor factories continue to use benzene at unsafe levels, making it one of the top 20 chemicals produced in volume in the United States. Click to read more about Leukemia and the Workplace.

If you believe industry has caused your leukemia, contact the Consumer Justice Group immediately. Limits exist on the time you have to act. Let us begin work for you today.


MORE STORIES IN THIS ISSUE

- The Future of Leukemia Treatments is Here…
- Leukemia Finds Its Way into the Workplace...
- Alternative Medicine & Options…
- Qualifying for Clinical Trials…
- Benzene, Killer of American Working Class…

VIEW ALL OF OUR NEWSLETTERS!

- Stock Fraud News
- Drug Recall News
- Workers' Compensation News
- Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect News
- Leukemia Health News

 

 

 

 

 

Return to FDA Recall News

FDA Proposes New, Tougher Procedures for Membership on Advisory Committees

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced new draft guidance that would implement a more stringent approach for considering potential conflicts of interest for its advisory committee members and for recommending eligibility for meeting participation. FDA is accepting public comments on the proposal for the next 60 days.

"FDA is committed to making the advisory committee process more rigorous and transparent so that the public has confidence in the integrity of the recommendations made by its advisory committees," said Randall Lutter, Ph.D., FDA's acting deputy commissioner for policy. "Today's draft guidance document should provide more consistency in the consideration of who is eligible to participate in advisory committee meetings and would simplify the process."

FDA currently screens all prospective advisory committee participants before each meeting to determine whether the potential for a financial conflict of interest exists. Under law, FDA may grant a waiver when certain criteria are met, such as when the need for an individual's expertise outweighs the potential for a conflict of interest.

The draft guidance document would replace guidance issued in 2000 on FDA Waiver Criteria (www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/conflictofinterest/intro.html). The 2000 guidance attempted to address the complex set of variables that can be applied in reaching a decision about an individual advisory committee participant. However, because of its complexity, FDA officials found it difficult to achieve consistent results that the public could readily understand.

This new guidance (www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/waiver/coiguidedft.html) would reduce the likelihood that the process for recommending waivers would vary from meeting to meeting. In addition to a more streamlined approach for considering who may participate in meetings, FDA would tighten its policy for considering eligibility for participation. If an individual has disqualifying financial interests whose combined value exceeds $50,000, after applying certain exemptions, the person would generally not be considered for participation in the meeting, regardless of the need for his or her expertise. If the financial interests are $50,000 or less, after applying certain exemptions, the individual might be recommended to participate as a non-voting member. Only individuals with no potential conflicts would be eligible to fully participate in meetings as voting members.

Financial interest means the potential for gain or loss to a person (or their family and outside affiliations) as a result of the government's action on a particular topic. Financial interests screened include, but are not limited to, stock ownership, related research and consulting arrangements.

A notice will appear in the Federal Register soon. To submit electronic comments on the draft guidance, visit www.regulations.gov or www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. Written comments may be sent to: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD, 20852. Comments must include the docket number 2007D-0101.

Today's announcement is part of the agency's overall effort to improve its advisory committee process. As announced in January, FDA will be establishing a new advisory committee on how to improve FDA's communication policies and practices consistent with the best available and evolving evidence. In addition, the agency launched a Web page dedicated to improving recruitment of advisory committee members and enhancing public participation in the process. For more information, go to: www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/.

Advisory committees provide FDA with independent advice from outside experts on issues related to human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, and food. In general, advisory committees include a chair, several members, plus a consumer, industry, and sometimes a patient representative. Additional experts with special knowledge may be consulted as needed. Although the committees provide advice to the agency, their recommendations are not binding and FDA makes final decisions.

This page is an advertisement of the Consumer Justice Group, LLC. The opinions expressed herein are those of the Consumer Justice Group. The Group is a Washington, DC law firm. This website is not a solicitation for business in any other jurisdiction. The laws of the District of Columbia apply to this website. The information contained herein is not legal advice. All trademarks and copyrights are those of their respective owners.